I like decisiveness. I like things to happen. I'm a doer. I see trends and  take action. These are personality traits that have served me well over time even if things haven't gone my way. I have confidence in decisions when the research points in a particular direction. It's not hard to see which way the wind blows.

Maybe that's how Rachel Carson felt when she waited for the right time to publish her seminal work Silent Spring. She spent years gathering data before writing the book.

Unfortunately, she didn't live very long to see the seismic shift in public attitudes she inspired. The movement to ban DDT. The public awareness that led to the 1970s environmental movement. Because she died in 1964, two years after Silent Spring was published.

My journey to write a novel based on Rachel's struggle to finish Silent Spring, began at the Breadloaf Environmental Conference in Middelbury. I workshopped the first few chapters with a special group of people who provided encouragement and offered suggestions. A year later, I stayed at Rachel's family cottage to complete my manuscript. And since then,  I've had this sense of urgency to get it out into the world. 

I've been pitching to agents and a few have requested to read the manuscript. I've entered it into contests and it has placed as a finalist. I've got a novel that, while not perfect, is waiting for the right editor.

One of the reasons I wrote this novel is because I found many of the Gen Z students in my ecology class didn't know who she was. Then the 3 Body Problem tv series comes out and the main character is reading Silent Spring. The book rockets to #1 on Amazon. I know the time is right for this novel to get out into the world.

When I was in graduate school I worked on a research project for my faculty mentor. Her thesis was that with the lumber and mining industries folding in the western states there would be a lack of infrastructure and services for the populations near federal lands. This she presumed would be a disaster as the populations aged. What I found while digging through Forest Service demographic data was the opposite. Demographers predicted that the Baby Boomers with wealth would retire in these communities (think Bozeman, Montana) and there would be an economic boom. I brought this information with all of my sources documented to my faculty advisor and she gave me a deadpan look. Like this couldn't be possible. It didn't agree with her thesis. I knew I was right, and in the end, the data didn't lie.

When an intern with Save the River on the St. Lawrence, the board wanted me to set up a campaign to stop toxic waste. However, my research with state agencies informed me a more immediate problem was people's raw sewage ending up in the river because of faulty septic systems (or no systems). I developed an action plan that had no backing from the board. It wasn't until a decade later I learned they used my plan and it was a huge success.

Rachel must have felt similarly - the data don't lie - she knew she was right, something had to be done about the indiscriminate use of chemicals in nature. She faced her detractors in the chemical industry as she struggled to finish Silent Spring, all while fighting cancer.

And in my own quest to publish a novel based about her, I fear the waiting. I think about Anita Shreve, who probably had more to write, and then died of cancer, of Hilary Mantel. I recently heard that Madeline Miller, author of Circe and Song of Achilles, has long covid and it has derailed her plans to write a sequel. A friend told me a story about a guy who spent two years on a documentary and non-fiction book and had to stop because of a freak accident. 

Life is fleeting and anything can happen.

"Time itself is like the sea, containing all that came before us, sooner or later sweeping us away on its flood and washing over and obliterating the traces of our presence, as the sea this morning erased the foot-prints of the bird." Rachel Carson Field Notes Nags Head October 9, 1950 Source: Rachel Carson: Witness for Nature by Linda Lear. 

Around the time Rachel Carson published Silent Spring, the picture here appeared on the cover of Seventeen Magazine with the headline: How to make a boy say wow! And, at least this too: How to get the most from a college visit. The message? Go to college and find a husband.

Rachel's Silent Spring unsettled a lot of scientists, specifically chemists working for the chemical industry who had everything to lose financially from her radical thesis. So they questioned it. Were we over using chemicals? Was the government not protecting its citizens?

Her message rattled farmers dependent on chemicals to protect their crops from pests, and scientists who advocated DDT would eradicate pests plaguing majestic street trees like the Elm. There was also the fact that our government used DDT during World War II to protect troops stationed in Italy and the Pacific against malaria. Everything she proposed in her book went against the standards of the time.

Predictably, she was ridiculed and demeaned by the press, by politicians, public figures who represented the agricultural industry, and by heads of corporations.

However, she had the public in her favor. In fact, the letters to the editor of The New Yorker after Rachel's excerpts appeared in their June 1962 issue were overwhelming in her favor. Many were from state agencies of fish and wildlife that wanted copies of the magazine to distribute to politicians in their region. Luckily, an archivist saved me some time by providing a list of the handful of letters unfavorable to the article, and the majority that were favorable. So I didn't have to comb through each one. I went right to the disgruntled letters. 

"In any large scale pest control program in the area, we are confronted with vociferous, misinformed, ...bird-loving...citizenry that has not been convinced of the importance of agriculture..."

Another wrote that her work was misleading. It produced fear and didn't educate.

Another stated that her reference to the selfishness of the chemical industry is from her Communist sympathies.

And we can live without birds and animals, but not business. Isn't it like a woman to be scared?

There were other attacks on Rachel after Silent Spring was published in the fall of 1962. She handled it with grace. In a CBS  documentary titled The Silent Spring of Rachel Carson, she didn't lose her composure as she adamantly defended her work. As a counter-point, the show also interviewed chemist Dr. Robert White Stevens who claimed if we were to follow her advice, man would return to the Dark Ages. An over-generalization if I ever heard one.

In her statement before the Senate Government Operations Committee in 1963, she raised awareness that the indiscriminate application of pesticides. Their ubiquitous presence in the environment, she intimated, could be wreaking havoc on humans, and there was no effort to examine the implications at a national level. 

I think what she demonstrated is if you know you're right about something, people eventually come around to the same conclusion. And they come to respect you for your determination. So as long as you can hold on to your conviction, whatever that might be, without losing your dignity in the process.

Source: New York Public Library The New Yorker Records.